Showing posts with label Richard Nixon. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Richard Nixon. Show all posts

Friday, November 15, 2013

Incognito, Nixon, Paterno and the Pope

Last week, I met a remarkable woman, a newly appointed CEO.  We were discussing her institution, a non-profit healthcare provider serving the underprivileged community in the inner city.  She confessed that she and her management team were struggling to re-define their business strategy.  When I asked her about the leadership culture, she professed that she was proud of the culture that her team embraced.

I probed a bit and she told me (I’m paraphrasing):  “we get together on a regular basis to talk about what we’re doing and we remind each other that our mission is more important than our individual needs.” 

It’s often said that culture starts at the top and that’s how it happens. 
 
Miami Dolphins Incognito and Martin
Much has been written about how the 300 pounders in theMiami Dolphins locker room treat one another.  The pundits, including a lot of league veterans, have told us that the team’s leadership has failed if they didn’t know what was going on.  Culture starts at the top after all.  But, while the criticism is well aimed, it strikes me that the pundits deserve a 15-yard penalty for “piling on”.

The ex-players and coaches and the sports journalists from ESPN and other news outlets are part of the community – the league, the veterans, the media – that benefits from the NFL’s continued success.  It’s in their best interest to describe the event as an isolated incident and blame local management.

We’ve seen it many times – Nixon’s White House, Penn State and, perhaps the most egregious of all, the Vatican. 
Nixon addressing the press

Cover-ups are instinctive.  Self-deception is the rule not the exception, which is why so many decision makers behave in ways that will likely hurt them and others in the long haul.  It’s why so many students and alumni of Penn State came to Joe Paterno’s defense.  It’s why so many Catholics continued to admire Pope John Paul II even after it was revealed that the church had covered up the child molestation scandal for decades. 

Cover-ups are strategic too. Those conspiring at Penn State were rational in their belief that adverse publicity would destroy careers and the reputation of their institution.  Unfortunately, it’s not unlike low interest loan.  Sooner or later there’s a balloon payment due. 
 
Sandusky with Paterno
In my days as a naval officer and as a midshipman at the Naval Academy, we often debated whether leaders are born or made.  It’s a variation on nature vs. nurture, often discussed in child rearing.

There are people who are natural born leaders.  There is an indefinable aura about them.   Political and military leaders like Colin Powell and Nelson Mandela come to mind.  Business leaders like Meg Whitman and Steve Jobs also fit the mold. 

But, many good or even great leaders lack charisma.  Former Defense Secretary Robert Gates is a great example.  A quiet even unassuming man, he gave up an easy glide into retirement at a Texas university to help President Bush restore leadership and integrity to the Pentagon.  And, he stayed on when asked by President Obama to ease the transition to a new administration in the midst of two wars.  Clearly, he viewed the mission as more important than his individual needs.

And, it’s fair to say that not all charismatic people are great leaders as anyone who has read Walter Isaacson’s biography of Steve Jobs knows by now. 

Leadership skills and behavior can be learned.  And, it’s important to learn those skills as you grow and develop in your life and career.  You need to know what to do, how to respond, how to lead before the crisis hits.  In the end, you are what you do, especially in the midst of chaos.  And, what the conspirators in Washington, University Park and Rome have done is unworthy of anyone who aspires to leadership. 

Pope John Paul II
As for Miami, time will tell.  But, the central conundrum of crisis management is that doing the right thing doesn’t necessarily save the institution or the people running it.  That’s why it’s so hard for top management to come clean.  What would have happened to the administrators at Penn State, the top guys in Nixon’s White House or the Pope’s Cardinals and Bishops if they had done the right thing?

They would not have been lauded for their honesty.  Whistle blowers usually don’t fare well in modern society.

Our psychological need to think well of ourselves combined with our instinct for self-preservation makes it much more difficult to do what’s right, what’s best for the institution we represent.

That’s why it’s so rare that we meet someone who places mission above his or her personal needs.


WHO WILL LEAD? 

Sunday, April 22, 2012

Is This a Claude Rains Moment?

Claude Rains as Captain Renault
I love old movies. Perhaps it’s because I grew up watching them. In those pre-Sesame Street days, after school television was largely a choice between soap operas and the Million Dollar Movie. Independent NY channel 9 (WOR-TV) would run the same movie twice a day for five afternoons. So, I grew up watching old movies from the 30’s and 40’s. Perhaps that would explain my poor social skills.



One of my favorites (and, I am not alone on this) was Casablanca. The romantic WW II classic starring Humphrey Bogart and Ingrid Bergman had a great supporting cast including Claude Rains as a corrupt French policeman.

The ordering by the Nazi’s to find a reason to shut down Rick’s CafĂ© (Bogart’s establishment) elicits the following dialog between Rick and Rain’s Captain Renault

Rick: How can you close me up? On what grounds?
Captain Renault: I'm shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on in here!
[a croupier hands Renault a pile of money]
Croupier: Your winnings, sir.
Captain Renault: [sotto voce] Oh, thank you very much.

I thought of him this week when the news broke of members of the Secret Service and (gasp!) our very own military were discovered to have engaged the services of prostitutes in Colombia. I am shocked, shocked to find that members of our military and Secret Service engaged the services of prostitutes.

But, this is not a joke. There are a couple of issues here:

Prostitution is legal in Colombia. What's the controversy? Are we to hold these public servants to a standard that is above the law? Who sets the standard? How does a member of the Secret Service know what the standard is?

Well, there is a higher standard. It’s called a security clearance. And, though I seriously doubt that everyone who engages the services of a prostitute has had theirs lifted, in this case, that’s exactly what happened.

But, I wonder. Are activities that are legal some places but not others permissible? Drugs are legal in Switzerland and prostitution is legal in the Netherlands. Should members of the Secret Service be precluded from engaging in legal activities in other countries if they are not legal in the US?

The larger issue, of course, is the potential security risk associated with inviting prostitutes into a hotel room that houses the President's itinerary and other details of his trip to South America. What's to stop a potential terrorist or assassin from paying a prostitute to spirit away some of the confidential documents that contain these details in the middle of the night?

Something nearer to me personally is the scandal that just broke about alleged rapes at West Point and Annapolis and the associated cover-up. Two women – one from each of the Academies – have alleged that they were raped as students (cadets, midshipmen) and that senior officers were unresponsive to their complaints. If true, it is unconscionable. Women were first admitted to the Academies in 1976. By now, their participation in our armed forces and their evaluation on the basis of merit should be a matter of routine.

I am reminded of the Tailhook scandal in 1992. Navy Lt. Paula Coughlin was forced to run a gauntlet of drunken pilots who groped her and tore at her clothes. The annual Tailhook convention was attended by some of the same senior officers who should have been preventing this type of behavior.

When the story broke, then Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney asked for and received the resignation of the Secretary of the Navy (the Navy’s CEO), Lawrence Garrett III. Several senior officers were relieved of their responsibility and punished for the cover-up. The Navy embarked upon an education program to prevent future occurrences of sexual harassment.

It’s time for a refresher course.

There will always be breaches of acceptable conduct and there will always be cover-ups. The larger question is how will the leadership of these important institutions respond?

The Catholic Church covered up sexual abuse of children for decades, a breach that I still find the most egregious of any in my lifetime. Richard Nixon and his close advisors engaged in a cover-up of the Watergate burglary. The cover-up was worse than the crime.

So, it will be interesting to watch the events of the next few weeks. How will the LEADERS of these important institutions respond as the facts unfold? What will the current Secretaries of the Army and Navy do? How about the head of the Secret Service? How will they respond?

Will they act like true LEADERS? Or, will they act like Claude Rains?

WHO WILL LEAD?