Greed, for lack of a better word, is good!
Gordon Gekko (as played by Michael Douglas in the movie Wall Street)
This now famous line from the movie Wall Street is on the minds of lots of people these days. For some, it’s because of the release of its sequel this weekend; for others, it’s because of the popular feeling that Wall Street is the cause of our current difficulties. I once heard the film’s producer, director and playwright, Oliver Stone, express his dismay that so many people (presumable people who work on Wall Street) had taken the Gordon Gekko soliloquy as a mantra for their business philosophy.
Yet, it’s not unlike other movie lines or speeches that have entered the popular culture. I once heard a senior sales guy at major software company recite the entire Alec Baldwin speech from Glengarry Glen Ross. He obviously delighted in the cadence, the words and the delivery of it. It was also obvious that he embraced its philosophy. You can catch it on YouTube if you missed it on Broadway or in theatres.
Movies love to create villains that reflect popular feeling. Taken out of context, the Gekko quote is reprehensible. But, the central theme of the speech was that in a free enterprise system, companies that don’t continually reinvent themselves go out of business.
So, let me get this out of my system, just to set the stage. Capitalism, by definition, is driven by the motivation to make money. If greed is a human emotion defined as the desire to have more money, then capitalism is about greed.
Yet, capitalism is also the driver of our economic success. It enables entrepreneurs to become billionaires and it provides employment for millions. It has also permitted the citizens of this country to enjoy the most comfortable lifestyle in the world. Capitalism is not about being humanitarian.
Yet, we don’t – and shouldn’t – define our culture as greedy or even capitalist. We define it more holistically. Our most successful capitalist, Bill Gates, has given most of his fortune to his foundation which by all reports does lots of good work. His foundation is not a capitalist enterprise, it is a humanitarian one.
So, is Bill Gates the country’s greediest person or the most generous?
Most of the successful people I know are involved in charitable activities ranging from volunteering in their community to donating their hard earned cash to their favorite cause. Personally, I have served on the board of Aid to Victims of Domestic Abuse (AVDA), www.avdaonline.org and currently serve on the board of Operation Homefront of Florida, www.operationhomefront.net/florida. I don’t get paid to do it. I do it because I want to.
Alec Baldwin’s character was in the real estate business and my colleague, his disciple, was in the software business yet we are not negatively disposed toward those industries. Yet, these days we are all pissed off at Wall Street’s “fat cat bankers”.
Why? Because they are greedy? Or, is it because “we” bailed them out and they show no remorse for what has happened to the economy as a result of the overindulgence of an entire industry?
Whatever the reason, it’s time to get over it. We need Wall Street. Furthermore, we need Wall Street to be successful. In addition to providing capital to our economy, it is among the few industries where the United States is still a world leader. That leadership brings new money into our economy from foreign investors and provides jobs for many thousands of people.
Apple Computer went public 30 years ago with the help of Morgan Stanley. Would it be the company it is today without Wall Street? In 2006, Morgan Stanley was also lead underwriter of the IPO of First Solar, the Ohio company which is the world’s largest manufacturer of solar panels. The company used the funds to expand its manufacturing facilities in Maryland, adding jobs in the process.
So, am I saying that greed really is good? Let me express it a bit differently. When I haven’t worked on Wall Street, I have worked for Wall Street money. And, I am here to tell you that “money doesn’t care”. It doesn’t care about people or the environment or the local church. It only cares about making more money. And, that’s the way it should be. That’s what makes our economy so resilient and, ultimately, that is what will pull us out of this mess we’re in.
And, before you let yourself off the hook, ask yourself if your money cares. Do you read every prospectus from every mutual fund or 401K in which you are invested? Do you take your money out of any investment that isn’t friendly to the environment or fair to its employees? Probably not. Why? Because your money just wants to make more money too. That's why, in our busy lives, most of us just check our monthly brokerage statements to see if we made more money last month.
Oh, and by the way, it’s Wall Street that is working hard to make you that money.
Just like Bill Gates, the desire to make more money is part of us but it’s not all of us.
But, it’s election season and conflict creates drama. Politicians and the media need conflict to get your attention. Casting Wall Street as the enemy is a great way to get votes.
The role of a leader who wants to change the current paradigm isn’t to feed the media the conflict it seeks; it is, rather, to rise above it and provide a vision of how we work together to solve the crisis.
It leaves me wondering, as usual, WHO WILL LEAD?
Monday, September 27, 2010
Monday, September 13, 2010
Is That What Jesus Would Do? Really?
• History, I believe, furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free civil government. This marks the lowest grade of ignorance of which their civil as well as religious leaders will always avail themselves for their own purposes (Letter to von Humboldt, 1813).
Thomas Jefferson
Reluctant though I am to wade into the subject of religion, last week’s news from Gainesville, FL cannot be ignored in the context of leadership. I found it remarkable that opinion makers throughout the civilized world are unanimous on the subject of burning the Koran. President Obama, Anne Coulter, General Petraeus, Hillary Clinton, Sarah Palin, Michael Bloomberg and Glenn Beck can all agree that Rev. Jones publicity stunt is well over the line. So, the answer to the question “WHO WILL LEAD?” is “nearly everyone”. Everyone, that is, except the Reverend Jones.
I can only imagine that Jones himself never thought he would cause such uproar. And, ultimately he backed off. But, the impact of the now cancelled event is extraordinary nonetheless. Perhaps the most insightful remark came from the Secretary of State who said, in part, “It is regrettable that a pastor in Gainesville, Florida, with a church of no more than 50 people can make this outrageous and . . . disgraceful plan and get the world’s attention, but that’s the world we live in right now.” (Maybe the Reverend was just trying to get his attendance up to 100.)
She was talking about the global reach of media and communications and, of course, she was right. But in other respects, the current controversy has a familiar ring to it. Americans have attached their worst instincts to their belief in God and their membership in their church throughout our history. Our attackers use the Koran as the justification for their actions; therefore, our tribal instincts cause an unthinking rejection of Islam.
A few years ago, it was popular for Christians to ask themselves, “What would Jesus do?” It’s a good question for all of us to ask ourselves from time to time whether we are Christian or not. The answers define our values but not necessarily our conduct.
Some fundamentalist Christians rejected the candidacy of Mitt Romney because of his Mormonism. In 1960, those same elements rejected JFK because he was a Catholic?
Is that what Jesus would do? Really?
In the 1840’s, the Bible Riots in Philadelphia resulted from a reaction to a wave of Irish Catholic immigrants. Nativists spread rumors that Catholics were trying to have the Bible removed from the public schools. A local Catholic Church armed itself for its own defense only to provoke the local citizenry and bring both the police and the Army into the fray. Indeed, the priests had acquired 5 muskets. The locals, in turn, seized a military cannon and fired upon the church.
Is that what Jesus would do? Really?
The history of the world is rife with examples of wars fought on behalf of God. The Crusades in the twelfth century, the British vs. the Spanish in the 16th and the French civil wars (Protestants against Catholics) of that same era were all fought in the name of God.
Is that what Jesus would do? Really?
Northern Ireland found itself in turmoil for a generation during the 20th century because Protestants and Catholics still can’t seem to coexist. Sadat and Rabin were both assassinated by fundamentalists among their own citizenry because they dared to make peace. Fundamentalist Christian, Eric Rudolph, planted a bomb at the Atlanta Olympics and murdered a doctor who performed abortions.
Is that what Jesus would do? Really?
The Muslim concept of jihad is echoed in the theory of Just War advanced by St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas. It was the Popes who granted the Divine Right of Kings to sovereigns of the Middle Ages. Perhaps they figured, “well, they’re gonna fight their wars anyway so I better give them cover”.
Is that what Jesus would do? Really?
So, the Reverend Jones gets to have his 15 minutes of fame and we are left wondering about the significance of it all. I am happy to see that government leaders and media personalities alike rose to stand against his actions. I am hopeful that we will look back on this uproar in 10 or 20 years and recognize it as a turning point.
After all, it has taken about 9 centuries to get to arrive at this juncture in history. Violence in the name of God has evolved from sovereign nations fighting wars in the middle ages to civil wars in the 16th Century to civil disturbance in the 19th and 20th to acts of terrorism in the 21st. Terrorism, after all, is a desperate act by the disenfranchised.
The opinion leaders, elected or otherwise, have echoed Jefferson’s concept of a secular society and freedom of religious thought and worship. This rare display of leadership should be celebrated.
By the way, if you or Reverend Jones ever wants to see Thomas Jefferson’s copy of the Koran, you need to go no further than Washington, DC. It’s in the Smithsonian Museum.
TO LEAVE A COMMENT, CLICK THE “COMMENTS” LINK BELOW
Thomas Jefferson
Reluctant though I am to wade into the subject of religion, last week’s news from Gainesville, FL cannot be ignored in the context of leadership. I found it remarkable that opinion makers throughout the civilized world are unanimous on the subject of burning the Koran. President Obama, Anne Coulter, General Petraeus, Hillary Clinton, Sarah Palin, Michael Bloomberg and Glenn Beck can all agree that Rev. Jones publicity stunt is well over the line. So, the answer to the question “WHO WILL LEAD?” is “nearly everyone”. Everyone, that is, except the Reverend Jones.
I can only imagine that Jones himself never thought he would cause such uproar. And, ultimately he backed off. But, the impact of the now cancelled event is extraordinary nonetheless. Perhaps the most insightful remark came from the Secretary of State who said, in part, “It is regrettable that a pastor in Gainesville, Florida, with a church of no more than 50 people can make this outrageous and . . . disgraceful plan and get the world’s attention, but that’s the world we live in right now.” (Maybe the Reverend was just trying to get his attendance up to 100.)
She was talking about the global reach of media and communications and, of course, she was right. But in other respects, the current controversy has a familiar ring to it. Americans have attached their worst instincts to their belief in God and their membership in their church throughout our history. Our attackers use the Koran as the justification for their actions; therefore, our tribal instincts cause an unthinking rejection of Islam.
A few years ago, it was popular for Christians to ask themselves, “What would Jesus do?” It’s a good question for all of us to ask ourselves from time to time whether we are Christian or not. The answers define our values but not necessarily our conduct.
Some fundamentalist Christians rejected the candidacy of Mitt Romney because of his Mormonism. In 1960, those same elements rejected JFK because he was a Catholic?
Is that what Jesus would do? Really?
In the 1840’s, the Bible Riots in Philadelphia resulted from a reaction to a wave of Irish Catholic immigrants. Nativists spread rumors that Catholics were trying to have the Bible removed from the public schools. A local Catholic Church armed itself for its own defense only to provoke the local citizenry and bring both the police and the Army into the fray. Indeed, the priests had acquired 5 muskets. The locals, in turn, seized a military cannon and fired upon the church.
Is that what Jesus would do? Really?
The history of the world is rife with examples of wars fought on behalf of God. The Crusades in the twelfth century, the British vs. the Spanish in the 16th and the French civil wars (Protestants against Catholics) of that same era were all fought in the name of God.
Is that what Jesus would do? Really?
Northern Ireland found itself in turmoil for a generation during the 20th century because Protestants and Catholics still can’t seem to coexist. Sadat and Rabin were both assassinated by fundamentalists among their own citizenry because they dared to make peace. Fundamentalist Christian, Eric Rudolph, planted a bomb at the Atlanta Olympics and murdered a doctor who performed abortions.
Is that what Jesus would do? Really?
The Muslim concept of jihad is echoed in the theory of Just War advanced by St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas. It was the Popes who granted the Divine Right of Kings to sovereigns of the Middle Ages. Perhaps they figured, “well, they’re gonna fight their wars anyway so I better give them cover”.
Is that what Jesus would do? Really?
So, the Reverend Jones gets to have his 15 minutes of fame and we are left wondering about the significance of it all. I am happy to see that government leaders and media personalities alike rose to stand against his actions. I am hopeful that we will look back on this uproar in 10 or 20 years and recognize it as a turning point.
After all, it has taken about 9 centuries to get to arrive at this juncture in history. Violence in the name of God has evolved from sovereign nations fighting wars in the middle ages to civil wars in the 16th Century to civil disturbance in the 19th and 20th to acts of terrorism in the 21st. Terrorism, after all, is a desperate act by the disenfranchised.
The opinion leaders, elected or otherwise, have echoed Jefferson’s concept of a secular society and freedom of religious thought and worship. This rare display of leadership should be celebrated.
By the way, if you or Reverend Jones ever wants to see Thomas Jefferson’s copy of the Koran, you need to go no further than Washington, DC. It’s in the Smithsonian Museum.
TO LEAVE A COMMENT, CLICK THE “COMMENTS” LINK BELOW
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)