Showing posts with label Secret Service. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Secret Service. Show all posts

Monday, November 3, 2014

Institutional failure and my narrow military mind

Map of the path of the White House intruder

I spent five years of active duty in the Navy bouncing around the Atlantic Ocean practicing for things that were unlikely to happen and, in fact, never did.  I was Chief Engineer and later Executive Officer of a minesweeper.  If the Soviets had laid mines in Chesapeake Bay, we could disarm them.  Or, if a German U-boat had popped up in the Savannah River, we could help track it down.  Those things never happened; but, if they had, we were ready.

Does that seem foolish to you?  Well, not to me.  Readiness is critical to responding correctly when a crisis occurs. 

Perhaps it’s my military background that has caused me to have a common reaction to what many are calling institutional failure at every level of government. 

When a policeman shot and killed Michael Brown in Ferguson, MO, my first thought was…

… training and culture.

When an intruder made it into the White House despite five layers of Secret Service security, my reaction was…

… training and culture.

When two nurses who had treated an Ebola patient in Dallas, TX contracted Ebola themselves, I wondered about…

… training and culture.

What kind of training did Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson go through before someone pinned a badge on his chest?  Was it like we have seen on a TV show or movie?  You know, the trainee is tiptoeing through a faux urban landscape doing his or her best to separate the real threats from moms with baby carriages in a split second.  React incorrectly and you either kill the mom or get killed by a pistol toting drug dealer.   

Did Darren Wilson go through that kind of training?  How did he do?

My impression of the Secret Service has always been aligned with my view of an elite force, like the Navy SEALS or the US Marshall Service.  Longstanding tradition reinforces habits that lead to near flawless execution.  So, how does anyone hop a fence, run across the White House lawn and get halfway to the President’s living quarters before someone catches up with him?

Those trained for these professions go through some sort of thought reform aka brainwashing to reprogram the way they respond when faced with a deadly threat.  I am not engaging in hyperbole.  Our central nervous system is geared to trigger a fight or flight response when facing a threat, real or imagined.  Our adrenal glands secrete cortisol, causing us to react according to nature’s programming.  To overcome the instinct, we practice and drill until our brains are rewired to respond differently.  Brainwashing requires isolation and control, an environment found in boot camp or a police academy.

Nurses don’t all work for the same organization obviously.  However, their training requires the same kind of rigor.  Their effectiveness is the result of how well they absorbed their training and how well they are supported and enabled by the institution for which they work.  So, when the head of the Centers for Disease Control says we’re “rethinking” our response to Ebola and nurses say they’re not ready, we should be concerned.  That’s tantamount to going to war when soldiers haven’t been trained to fire their weapons. 

Maintaining a strong institutional culture requires ritualistic behavior; a concisely worded, well-understood, oft repeated mission statement, and respect for the long-standing traditions of an organization.  It requires that leaders tell compelling stories that are repeated in the ranks.  It is essential that people at the top solicit the opinions of people at the bottom to ensure they are getting the right training and the right support to perform the mission.  As Colin Powell put it, “Leadership is solving problems. The day soldiers stop bringing you their problems is the day you have stopped leading them. They have either lost confidence that you can help or concluded you do not care. Either case is a failure of leadership”.

Addressing these challenges requires a military approach to training and the visible presence of a credible leader with the authority to get the job done.  Imagine if the President had appointed the right person to be the “Ebola Czar”, he or she would have been on TV that day calming our nerves by telling us what will happen and how.  His or her mere presence and bearing would give us confidence.  We saw small samples of the impact of physical and visible presence when New York Mayor Bill DeBlasio visited the same restaurants and the bowling alley as Ebola patient Dr. Craig Spencer and when US Ambassador to the UN Samantha Power visited West Africa.

Imagine if the Ebola Czar (what’s his name?) evoked the power of those images.


WHO WILL LEAD?

Sunday, April 22, 2012

Is This a Claude Rains Moment?

Claude Rains as Captain Renault
I love old movies. Perhaps it’s because I grew up watching them. In those pre-Sesame Street days, after school television was largely a choice between soap operas and the Million Dollar Movie. Independent NY channel 9 (WOR-TV) would run the same movie twice a day for five afternoons. So, I grew up watching old movies from the 30’s and 40’s. Perhaps that would explain my poor social skills.



One of my favorites (and, I am not alone on this) was Casablanca. The romantic WW II classic starring Humphrey Bogart and Ingrid Bergman had a great supporting cast including Claude Rains as a corrupt French policeman.

The ordering by the Nazi’s to find a reason to shut down Rick’s CafĂ© (Bogart’s establishment) elicits the following dialog between Rick and Rain’s Captain Renault

Rick: How can you close me up? On what grounds?
Captain Renault: I'm shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on in here!
[a croupier hands Renault a pile of money]
Croupier: Your winnings, sir.
Captain Renault: [sotto voce] Oh, thank you very much.

I thought of him this week when the news broke of members of the Secret Service and (gasp!) our very own military were discovered to have engaged the services of prostitutes in Colombia. I am shocked, shocked to find that members of our military and Secret Service engaged the services of prostitutes.

But, this is not a joke. There are a couple of issues here:

Prostitution is legal in Colombia. What's the controversy? Are we to hold these public servants to a standard that is above the law? Who sets the standard? How does a member of the Secret Service know what the standard is?

Well, there is a higher standard. It’s called a security clearance. And, though I seriously doubt that everyone who engages the services of a prostitute has had theirs lifted, in this case, that’s exactly what happened.

But, I wonder. Are activities that are legal some places but not others permissible? Drugs are legal in Switzerland and prostitution is legal in the Netherlands. Should members of the Secret Service be precluded from engaging in legal activities in other countries if they are not legal in the US?

The larger issue, of course, is the potential security risk associated with inviting prostitutes into a hotel room that houses the President's itinerary and other details of his trip to South America. What's to stop a potential terrorist or assassin from paying a prostitute to spirit away some of the confidential documents that contain these details in the middle of the night?

Something nearer to me personally is the scandal that just broke about alleged rapes at West Point and Annapolis and the associated cover-up. Two women – one from each of the Academies – have alleged that they were raped as students (cadets, midshipmen) and that senior officers were unresponsive to their complaints. If true, it is unconscionable. Women were first admitted to the Academies in 1976. By now, their participation in our armed forces and their evaluation on the basis of merit should be a matter of routine.

I am reminded of the Tailhook scandal in 1992. Navy Lt. Paula Coughlin was forced to run a gauntlet of drunken pilots who groped her and tore at her clothes. The annual Tailhook convention was attended by some of the same senior officers who should have been preventing this type of behavior.

When the story broke, then Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney asked for and received the resignation of the Secretary of the Navy (the Navy’s CEO), Lawrence Garrett III. Several senior officers were relieved of their responsibility and punished for the cover-up. The Navy embarked upon an education program to prevent future occurrences of sexual harassment.

It’s time for a refresher course.

There will always be breaches of acceptable conduct and there will always be cover-ups. The larger question is how will the leadership of these important institutions respond?

The Catholic Church covered up sexual abuse of children for decades, a breach that I still find the most egregious of any in my lifetime. Richard Nixon and his close advisors engaged in a cover-up of the Watergate burglary. The cover-up was worse than the crime.

So, it will be interesting to watch the events of the next few weeks. How will the LEADERS of these important institutions respond as the facts unfold? What will the current Secretaries of the Army and Navy do? How about the head of the Secret Service? How will they respond?

Will they act like true LEADERS? Or, will they act like Claude Rains?

WHO WILL LEAD?